Looks like the multicell's have it!
Panomaniac....I'm using APT200's....nothing too fancy, but they sound quite good to me.
This project is for an upgrade to my modded La Scala's.....for the mid range. This is their weakest link. If I can improve this then I believe it will improve everything else as well.
They just don't have that effortless mid sound that a big speaker needs.
The search begins!! Thanks all.
None of the 300 hz multicells were designed or marketed for the size of rooms we have in our homes. We can disagree on personal preferences, but not that one horn is for long-throw and the others not.
Any of the 300 hz multicells will dwarf your LaScala bins.... The 311-60 is better suited size-wise to that cab, and does perform admirably well with the Altec phenolic midrange drivers. They will do your 400hz. with ease. Plus, they would be much simpler to ship to the "Land of Oz". Enjoy!
Kind of hard to recommend a specific horn when you don't define the app..........
Well, 'beamy' is relative in that if it fits the needs of the app it's just right, but in a typical HIFI app 60x60 works well as does 40-80 to 90. For longer listening distances then, narrower is better, ergo wider is better for sitting closer in smaller rooms or for many HT apps.
GM
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
(Roughly) what size for a 400Hz 90x40 conical?
"[I]We're going all the way, till the wheels fall off and burn[/I]!"
Bob Dylan, from [I]Brownsville Girl[/I]
[I]"Time wounds all heels"[/I]
John Lennon, referring to the Nixon/Hoover deportation fiasco.

Not sure what you are saying, but 10 cell muilticells are not long throw, and 203's are.
I've used 1003's in small clubs, only complaint was about the size. 203 would NOT have worked. At least not without multiples.
Are they all kinda big for the average living room? Yes but the issue is much more pronounced with 203's and the tight pattern.
Your neighbors called. They like your music.
Bookmarks